SOME COINCIDENCES OR POSSIBLE CASES OF HIGHER INTERVENTION?
* * * * * * *
As a result of a very wide reading of literature concerning the
2nd World War through fifty years, I have became gradually more aware of a number
of incidents and mistakes during it upon which the positive fate of the Allies
eventually turned out to hinge in remarkable ways. These could serve as striking
illustrations of the truth of the proverb, 'for the want of a nail, the battle
was lost'. Not all of these are well appreciated, nor is their peculiarly insignificant
or coincidental nature seen, which in the wisdom of hindsight seems out of proportion
to their importance for the outcome.
Most of the fateful strategic mistakes of the war were made by Hitler more
or less on his own, often against the advice of his best generals, and sometimes
in the face both of reason and common sense. The explanation of these fatal
errors is Hitler's having an unstable psyche and certain uncorrected paranoid
delusions, yet the fact that such enormously fateful consequences could depend
entirely upon virtual whims and fixed ideas shows how delicate the balance hangs
between good and an evil, a right or wrong outcome. An omniscient and omnipotent
divinity would only have had to make very minor interventions to alter the outcome
of the war.
Several major strategic victories depended, not merely on superiority in men,
weapons and materials, but on slender margins of difference. In his brilliant
analysis, Why the Allies Won, (U.K. 1995) Richard Overy wrote: "The decisive
engagement at Midway Island was won because ten American bombs out of the hundreds
dropped fell on the right target. The victory in the Atlantic came with the
introduction of a small number of long-range aircraft to cover the notorious
Atlantic Gap. The bombing offensive, almost brought to a halt in the winter
of 1943-4, was saved by the addition of long-range fuel tanks to escort-fighters,
a tiny expense in the overall cost of the bombing campaign. The Battle of Stalingrad
depended on the desperate, almost incomprehensible courage of a few thousand
men who held up the German 6th Army long enough to spring a decisive trap. The
invasion of France hung on the ability to keep the enemy guessing, against every
conceivable odds, the centre of operational gravity, and then on the weather."
In addition to these highly relevant instances, there are yet less obvious
but decisive details in these and other campaigns which would normally be put
down to 'accident'. In chronological order, the following are such examples:-
Chamberlain's 'unfeasable' military guarantee to Poland.
The accepted reason for the guarantee, shortly before the outbreak of war,
of military aid to Poland if attacked by Hitler was to try to hinder him from
usurping Danzig and the Polish Corridor, which he had demanded as German-populated
territory. Yet Britain (and also her ally, France) were entirely powerless to
lend armed support to geographically-isolated Poland in the event of German
hostilites, as the case later proved too. The guarantee also gave a largely
corrupt and out-dated militaristic oligarchy in Poland support in fighting an
impossible war (with cavalry!), rather than secede the partly-German territories
of Danzig and the Polish Corridor - the status of which had long been uncertain
or controversial anyhow - and possibly to save their country from the total
destruction that followed.
The declaration of war on Germany by Britain at that point in time was largely
a matter of honour (after the guarantee given) and of drawing a line against
Hitler somewhere at last. The British guarantee and consequent declaration of
war while so unprepared were both proven to be militarily very unsound, evidently
not based on any rational strategy. It was more of a 'gut-reaction' poker bluff
from a harried politician... which proved despite all to have a positive outcome.
Chamberlain's guarantee was an 'incalculable' hinge of fate which, due to the
turns of events beyond the control of human thought or action, saved the Continent
from the conquest of Russia and its consequences. This was mainly because of:-
Hitler's 'unforced gift' of Polish territory to Russia before any hostilities
commenced
Hitler's main aim - the conquest of Soviet Russia - was cunningly concealed
by the Hitler-Stalin pact, but it was delayed and weakened by the Allies' becoming
hostile on his western borders, which Hitler had not expected. This helped save
Russia in the long run, but Hitler's secret agreement with Russia was of equally
great moment for Russia's final salvation. The secret protocols of the Hitler-Stalin
pact divided Poland between Germany and Russia, thus in effect advancing Russia's
boundary 200 kms. westward towards Germany. Stalin was desperate to avoid war
with Hitler, as all his behaviour clearly signalled, at least for some years
until Russia would be able to reach Germany's military standards for the inevitable
conflict between them. The extra 200 kms. of Polish territory as a buffer between
them made all the difference in Hitler's invasion of Russia, which fell short
of its chief strategic goal, the occupation of Moscow, by only 40 kms. Had the
German Armies' starting point been 200 kms. closer Moscow they must have been
able to overrun Moscow before winter set in and thus achieve victory over the
Soviet Union. Hitler could have usurped the whole of Poland - ignoring the Soviet
pact - with small risk of Russian hostilities, as was also shown when Germany
later attacked Russia and were at first not even opposed by Stalin. Germany
knew well the exact condition of Stalin's desperate rearmament programme, for
they were themselves the suppliers of the industrial technology and even of
much of the combat air force. Hitler was already delayed by the second front
involving the invasion of the Low Countries and France, the failed campaign
against the British Isles and, last but not least, by their last-minute invasion
of the Balkan.
Therefore, had Chamberlain not given the Polish guarantee, totally ineffective
as it obviously proved to Poland, or opened a second front, Hitler would surely
have destroyed the Soviets, even despite the greater distance to Moscow involved
by the partition of Poland.
Hitler's not eliminating the British forces at Dunkirk
General von Rundtsted's panzer forces halted on Hitler's orders while over
400,000 British troops escaped. The Luftwaffe failed to stop the rescue, as
Hitler had supposed it would. Yet the panzers could with relative ease have
destroyed the backbone of the British Army - all the several hundred thousand
crack troops - and made a quick invasion (fully planned as 'Operation Sealion')
of the quite unprepared and still virtually unarmed British Isles a real possibility,
despite the British Navy. Hitler's decision proved to be his 'fatal mistake'
as regards Britain and thus of the outcome of the war. The mistake was made
due to Hitler's belief that his forces were atthe limit of their extent and
that the british were much better equipped than was the case, but also because
of his view that a stand-off could help make the British to enter an armistice
pact with him against the great common threat, Soviet Bolshevism.
The cessation of massed bombing raids at the moment prior to success
Goering stopped the bombing and strafing of R.A.F. fighter airfields, radar
stations and airplane factories on the very day after the R.A.F. had first been
left with not a single extra fighter to throw into the battle. The decisive
factor in the Battle of Britain was her defensive air power, which was right
on the verge of being broken. Had the Luftwaffe not changed their strategy of
bombing fighter stations when it was very close to success or had not avoided
fighter conflicts by going over to night bombing, a few more squadrons of Spitfires
would have been disable or shot down and Britain would have been virtually defenseless
to the planned invasion, as the Navy could only have operated effectively with
dominant air support in defending the beaches. Very shortly thereafter the factors
of success altered radically due to the further development of radar's range,
an improved mark of Spitfire etc., which robbed Germany of the chance successfully
to attack again. Hitler soon ridiculed Goering's boast about his mighty Luftwaffe
Blitzkrieg.
The single 'lucky torpedo' that hit the Bismark.
Many strategians view the sinking of the Bismark in May 1941 as possibly the
crucial turning point of the Battle of the Atlantic, and hence of the whole
war in Europe. It was not only the first major morale-building success of the
British, coming shortly after the Bismark had sunk the battleship Hood and while
the British debacle in Crete was under way. but also their gain of dominance
over the German sufrace fleet. The Bismark was the fastest warship afloat and
alone could outpace the Queen liners which were crucial, large capacity Atlantic
troopships. Had the the steering gear and one propellor of the powerfully steel-armoured
vessel Bismark not been disabled, by luck rather than judgement in an airborne
torpedo attack under dreadful weather conditions, it would soon have reached
the cover of the Luftwaffe and would then, together with the warships Scheinhorst
and Gneisenau and co-ordinated with U-boat packs, have been able from Brest
to dominate the Atlantic shipping lanes and sink millions of tons of Allied
shipping. As it was, without steering or power, the Bismark was pounded to death
by the surrounding British fleet. The convoy lifeline would have been broken
and the supplying and arming of Great Britain would have been crucially reduced.
This could well have been the blow that defeated Britain and made Germany virtually
impregnable.
Second front against the Soviets opened, weeks later than planned.
Many strategic commentators regard Hitler's decision to invade Russia and
thus fight on two fronts as the most fateful act of the war. However, conquest
of Russian Communism was Hitler's chief plan even before the first years of
the Nazi party. The unexpected huge success of his panzer-led armies on the
plains of Northern France gave every confidence of the same success on the plains
of Russia, which was indeed the case up until the onset of winter while still
40 kms. from Moscow. The invasion date was delayed by 6 weeks due to an incursion
to pacify the Balkans after American diplomatic agitation in Romania made Hitler's
flank and oil supplies insecure. Those 6 weeks proved crucial for the Red Army,
causing Hitler's forces to lose momentum before the Russian winter began. The
Balkan diversion was carefully engineered by Churchill and Roosevelt, who knew
exactly of Hitler's plan to invade Russia due to secret British possession of
the German cypher machine, Enigma, the codes of which were regularly broken.
Stalin had refused to believe their warnings, taking them as a mere attempt
to destroy the Russo-German pact, which was a continuation of existing broad
military and industrial co-operation for many years prior to the pact (the facts
of which first came to light as late as the mid-1990s).
Hitler's failure to secure North Africa before invading Russia
Hitler decided not to secure the Mediterranean and Malta by dominating the
whole of North Africa, including Egypt. North Africa was then held only in part
and by weak Italian forces, so as also to secure an impregnable desert base
line to the great continental 'triangle' that Hitler's forces had otherwise
pacified. The Italian weakness - plus the continued resistance of Malta - led
to Hitler having to sap his armies of crack divisions on his Eastern front,
including General Rommel, so as to shore up the failing Italians and then to
fight on two African fronts - with Montgomery in Egypt and the American-British
invasion from the west of North Africa. It was in North Africa that the Germans
decisively lost their first major tank battle, at El Alamein. Hitler was unable
to supply Rommel's panzers to regroup or counterattack due to the huge commitments
required on his Eastern front. With the African campaign, Germany had not two
fronts, but three, even four.
Hitler's unforced decision to sacrifice key forces at Moscow.
Hitler's implacable 'Hold or Die' order to the Wehrmacht's highly trained
land forces at the turn of 1941-2 on his eastern front (including Moscow) first
punctured the mutual myth of German invincibility, then broke morale as a whole
army froze, starved and was encircled. The initiative was lost in the Mediterranean
due to consequent lack of reinforcements and supplies there, esp. petroleum,
which were crucial in Rommel's defeat at El Alamein.
Hitler's one-sided, self-defeating declaration of war on the U.S.A.
Hitler declared war on the U.S. in support of the Axis ally, Japan, after
their very successful surprise attack on Pearl Harbour, even though this was
not required by any mutual treaty. Nor did Hitler ask for any reciprocal aid,
and most notably did not ensure that the Japanese reciprocate and attack the
Soviets, thus opening a second front to relieve the German armies, which were
already being counter-attacked and had retreated at Rostov. Nor did Hitler enter
into any other co-ordination of global plans with the Japanese, which could
conceivably easily have turned the direction of the whole war. With Russia non-belligerent,
the Japanese therefore gained a secure boundary to their north so that they
could launch an attack in southward directions instead. Worse by far, however,
for Hitler, was the fact that - unless he had declared war on the USA, Roosevelt
would hardly have been able to follow the strategically-essential 'Germany first'
policy, because American voters' anger was all directed towards Japan. Isolationist
scepticism towards European wars was still very strong too, and so was the opposition
of many generals and the US Navy to the Atlantic-first policy. It was very uncertain
whether Rooseveldt would even have felt able to declare war on Germany under
those circumstances. Thus, Hitler would have had free play in Europe.
'Chances' that gave the U.S. victory at the crucial Battle of Midway
The impetuous naval fleet commander Admiral Halsey was hospitalised for a
skin disorder just before the advance of the Japanese fleet for what became
the Midway battle. Halsey had recommended his friend Spruance as his replacement,
whose steady-minded judgement and unconventional tactics led to the American
victory against very long odds at the decisive Midway sea battle that set the
final limit to Japanese naval advancements across the Pacific. Spruance firstly
took the unusual initiative of sending his dive-bombers off before the enemy
did the same, even though the enemy fleet's position was not clearly known.
After the sinking of the chief Jap carriers and against great pressures from
his staff, Spruance very wisely refused to follow up by attacks on the remaining
Japanese fleet and withdrew out of range of the heavy battleships, thus saving
the only US carriers left in the Pacific and thus ensuring that Hawaii and the
U.S. West Coast were protected. The success in sinking four carriers was due
to the sheer chance. Japanese fighters were flying at low level to attack the
U.S. torpedo planes (which inflicted no carrier damage at all and were mostly
shot down) when the U.S. dive bombers found the target by chance at that moment,
after having lost their way and searching for it. Hence, the dive bombers had
unimpeded flight-paths to the carriers, which they would not have had if Japanese
Zero fighters had not all then been engaged at sea level. Had Admiral Halsey
been fit, moreover, the strategic battle would almost certainly not have been
won. The ten bombs mentioned by Overy (see introduction) virtually crippled
the Japanese fleet for the rest of the war, since the crucial key to air supremacy
and hence control of the Pacific, four of its aircraft carriers, were sunk.
Hitler's obsession with Stalingrad
Hitler's later abandonment of his most professional and battle-hardened Sixth
Army to encirclement and elimination at Stalingrad in the autumn of 1943, rather
than accept their failure to take the city, which was not even strategically
necessary, as it could have been bypassed and soon have been flattened by constant
shelling instead. The loss of prestige at not taking the city with the name
of Hitler's chief enemy, Stalin, blinded Hitler to sound principles and obsessed
him violently. The 6th Army could have fought its way out to the West or towards
a relief force that came within 35 miles, but Hitler would not give General
Paulus permission to break out. Over 90,000 were taken prisoner and of these,
less than 5,000 survived imprisonment. 70,000 German lives were lost in the
battle itself. This virtually broke the back of the Wehrmacht both in terms
of efficient manpower and morale among all levels of military staff. General
Paulus' not following Hitler's order to commit suicide was an unprecedented
act of defiance.
Hitler's refusal to build the jet fighter
The Allies' massive bombing of Germany could have been stopped completely
by the Luftwaffe if Albert Speer had been allowed to continue production of
the superior fighter, the first jet-propelled airplane ever, developed already
there in 1943. Instead, Hitler insisted on production priority to bombers and
anti-aircraft ammunition and guns. Subsequent experience showed that fighter
power decided the air war over Germany, and that German machines were able to
win decisively in the air. Yet at the crucial period of the bombing of Germany,
insufficient numbers were available. Otherwise this could have reversed fortunes,
especially if the very superior German jet fighter had been produced earlier,
most probably despite the introduction of the long-range Mustang fighters that
at last successfully protected the bombers. The first German models of jet fighter
flew in combat in the last year of the war.
The failure of Hitler to recognise the D-Day invasion.
Though the invasion fleet of over 5,000 vessels was seen on radar, the operators
thought it must be due to static or other disturbance, perhaps due to bad weather...
even though they had long been expecting a major invasion. Their uncertainty
was compounded by the knowledge of very unfavourable general weather conditions
for invasion. Secondly, the overall commander von Rundstedt, who was in Paris
at the time, simply refused to believe that the interception of messages to
the French resistance from the BBC were the invasion signal, though the cipher
experts already knew the exact words that would announce the D-day invasion
of France had been awaiting them and recognised them immediately they arrived.
Thirdly, the defending forces on the Normandy shore were given no warning and
local armoured support was not provided until too late in the day. This was
due to the scepticism of Rommel's staff that the Normandy landing was the main
invasion, Rommel himself being absent in Germany. Fourth, von Rundtsteds' 5
panzer divisions of the Fifteenth Army, which could surely have crushed the
invasion on the beaches of the five Allied divisions, were not released from
the Pas de Calais. Hitler released only one division after great delays, while
the other four were held back for all of seven weeks in the belief that the
main attack would still come at Calais! The Allies had, however, gone to considerable
lengths to deceive the enemy as to where and when the main thrust would come.
Even so, unlike Hitler, Rommel and other generals realised that Normandy was
the main force within hours of being informed.
Compounding the confusion and indecision, Hitler was in Berechtsgaden, Bavaria,
having just gone to sleep with the aid of sleeping pills and nobody dared to
awaken him until late in the day, when Jodl briefed him at 10 a.m. After that
at noon, Hitler drove for one hour to attend a 'showpiece' briefing at Klessheim
Castle given for visiting Hungarian visitors of state! Hitler insisted on commanding
the panzers himself from Berechtsgaden, 500 miles away from the scene of battle...
a most inefficient battle arrangement.
The absence from the war zone on D-Day of Rommel and other commanders.
The first leave that Rommel had taken for months began early on June 4th,
about 40 hours before the invasion began, at which time he was beyond telephone
contact 500 miles away in Germany with his family on his wife's birthday. General
Rommel's H.Q. was in Normandy near the beaches. He was second-in-command of
the Western armies after General von Rundstedt, who was at Pas de Calais. Further,
Army Group B's operations officer, Von Tempelhof, was also in Germany. Admiral
Krancke, naval commander in the west, was absent on the way to Bordeaux. General
von Rundstedt's intelligence officer was off on leave and out of contact. Senior
commanders in Normandy and the Cherbourg peninsular were also away from their
commands partaking in a 'war-game' at Rennes in Brittany! (These included 243rd
Division commander Lt. Hellmich, Lt. Gen. von Schlieben, 709th Division, Major
General Falley, 91st Air Landing Division and Colonel Meyer-Detring). The fact
that a near gale was blowing on the 5th June, predicted to last 3 days, helped
cause the Germans to drop their guard.
The German Luftwaffe's absences from the war front on D-Day.
There were only two Luftwaffe planes operative in the area during most of
the first day. These two were the only remaining within range of the beaches,
two fighters of the 26th Fighter Wing, the planes of which the Luftwaffe High
Command had ordered away for safety from British bombing raids. No other fighter
units were available. The Allies flew 15,000 sorties unchallenged on the first
day. Only 183 Luftwaffe fighters are known to have been in the whole of France
at that time. The landing beaches were not bombed at all until late on June
6th by a squadron of Dorniers.
The absence of the guns of the Point du Hoc battery
The crucial guns covering the Omaha and Utah beaches from a 100 ft. high cliff
were found to be missing when the cliff was stormed by the Rangers. The guns
were later found heavily camouflaged and complete with ammunition etc., but
unmanned, half a mile inland, to where they had been moved, most likely due
to previous very heavy R.A.F. bombing.They could have caused incalculable damage,
but it seems that, by some mischance on the German side, the crews to man them
had never been sent.
The disrupted parachute drop confused the German defenders
The 12,000 soldiers of the 81st and 102nd American airborne divisions dropped
on the right flank of the Normandy beaches were spread by high winds and other
conditions, some landing 30 miles away from their objectives.This had the effect,
however, of baffling the Germans and made them think an extremely subtle plan
was underway, which mistaken idea cause them a crucial loss of time.
The accidental sinking of U-1063 that stopped a late U-boat offensive
The Observer for May 13, 1945 reported: "But for the accidental sinking of
U-boat No. 1063 in a fjord near Bergen last February, the war might still be
going on, certainly from Norway, and V-Day still to be celebrated." The U-boat
was on trials; it had dived and failed ever to surface again. It was one of
the first of a fleet of 200 prefabricated U-boats already in existence. The
reason for the accident, or any suspected fault was not found, due to which
the new fleet of U-boats were never sent into action. They could have prolonged
the war very considerably by causing great havoc to Atlantic convoys.
ALBERT SPEER'S VIEW OF EVENTS Albert Speer was undoubtedly Hitler's
closest associate for many of the most crucial years, the only non-political
figure given constant personal and private access to Hitler. He later became
a brilliant minister of armaments through most of the war, which he himself
served to prolong by many months - if not even over a year - through his competent
management and his limitation of economic damage from bombing and doubling of
armaments output. His monumental autobiography Inside the Third Reich
(Macmillan 1970) shows how Hitler's growing and excessive mismanagement of the
war came about. In a letter to Hitler written early April 1945 - which Hitler
incidentally officially refused to receive - Speer wrote: "I believe in the
future of the German people. I believe in a Providence that is just and inexhorable,
and thus I believe in God. It pained me deeply during the victorious days of
1940 to see how many among our leaders were losing their inner integrity. This
was the moment when we should have commended ourselves to Providence by our
decency and inner modesty. Then Fate would have been on our side. But during
these months we were weighed in the balance and found too light for ultimate
victory. We wasted a year of time luxuriating in our easily won success when
we could have been girding ourselves for battle. This was why we were caught
unprepared in the decisive years of 1944 and 1945. If all our new weapons had
been ready a year earlier, we would be in a very different position now. As
if we were being warned by providence, from 1940 on all our military undertakings
were dogged by unprecedented ill luck. Never before has an outside element such
as the weather played such a decisive and devastating role as in this, the most
technological of all wars: The cold in Moscow, the fog in Stalingrad, and the
blue sky above the winter offensive in the West in 1944." At that time, Speer was still a follower of Hitler, though he was actually
at odds with most of Hitler's orders and openly worked against many of them
in the higher interest of the German populace. Had Hitler followed Speer's well-founded
recommendations on the need for developing a fighter force, the early production
of the jet fighter and other advanced weapons already on the factory line -
instead of cancelling them in favour of ill-judged offensives and priorities
- the outcome of the war may have been very different indeed. Almost all of
Speer's priorities have been proved correct by the subsequent march of military
technology and strategy.
Conclusion
It is well-known how during the war many and varied experiences of fate and
fortune of rationally-inexplicable kinds are taken to be 'miraculous' by those
directly implicated. Few of these have consequences for the outcome in major
strategic and political terms. However, it appears from the above that the fate
of the world actually several times hinged very largely on such quite minor,
unpredictable and uncontrollable coincidental events or on entirely irrational
mistakes, some minor in nature but all major in consequence. These events were
fortunate for the Allies, to say the least, and tended strongly to reinforce
the conviction of those who saw Divine Providence at work through them.
History leaves no doubt that Hitler was the aggressor, though the great totalitarian
Russian state under Stalin was always the main enemy, an equally unprincipled
player for world domination and a growing threat to Hitler's Third Reich. Hitler
struck first, hoping for world domination before the USSR could develop its
tremendous resources. Hitler's armies were driven on by cunning and entirely
ruthless leaders ruling over the tyrannous Nazi State and its extremely brutal
terrorist organisations, the SS and the Gestapo. These fanatical forces fought
for ungodly ends, never eschewing the most unprecedented and terrible inhumane
means of warfare, suppression, torture, lethal experiments on prisoners and
the systematic extermination of millions of captives, both civilian and military
besides genocide against the Jews, gypsies and others minorities. The British
fighter ace, Richard Hillary, aptly wrote that the purpose of Nazism was to
"stamp out the divine spark in man". The 2nd World War war is estimated to have
cost over 25 million lives. In recently published research, the leader of the
Hawaiian Peace Research Institute, Rudolf J. Rummel, has shown that the death
toll of the three great totalitarian leaders to have been: Stalin = around 42
million deaths, Mao = 38 million and Hitler = 21 million.
The era of the Cold War and the Iron Curtain was, seen in terms of the spirit
of the times on a very broad canvas of cause and effect, a result and a reflection
of Cold Heartedness and Iron Materialism that predominated intellectual thought
in most nations throughout the 19th and 20th centuries. The tragic upheavals
and terrors of the two World Wars and the Cold War were doubtless inevitable
events, given the starting conditions. This is not to say that the historical
details or the exact events were necessarily predetermined.
(Note: The 'offensive in the West' refers to the 1944 Ardennes breakout by German
forces, also called the 'Battle of the Bulge'.)
That incidents of the type "the was lost for want of a nail" played so decisively into the historical outcome supports the idea of 'indeterminacy' also in human affairs... namely, that neither the individual person's acts nor the particular apparently insignificantly small event can be predicted nor discounted. Further, the production and dropping of the atomic bombs on Japan, which decisively decided the outcome of the Pacific war, are generally not held to have been inevitable. (Read further on the atomic bombing of Japan: 'Hiroshima's unavoidability?)
BRIEF BIBLIOGRAPHY(relevant to the above)